Review of the National Bowel Cancer Screening Program - Questions and Feedback
Feedback updated 30 Apr 2024
We asked
The department asked for your views and input on the Review of the National Bowel Cancer Screening Program (the Review). The Review was released for written stakeholder feedback from 6 April 2022 to 17 June 2022.
You said
18 submissions were received from a range of stakeholders including peak health bodies, advocacy organisations, First Nations health care services and state government organisations. The submissions were broadly supportive of the Review findings.
We did
Where appropriate, feedback provided on the Review has been considered to inform Program activities and enhancements.
A summary of the Review’s Findings and Program Reform Actions is provided in the below table.
Review Finding |
Program Reform Actions |
|
1 |
Consider feasibility of lowering screening entry age to 40 or 45 for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people, coupled with scale up of the Alternative Pathway pilot for this group. |
|
2 |
Review timing intervals for reminders with clinical input. |
|
3 |
Consideration should be given to alternate forms of communication which do not require simultaneous availability of the participant follow-up function (PFUF) officer and recipient (e.g., email/SMS). |
|
4 |
Support the Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care (ACSQHC) with its implementation of the Colonoscopy Clinical Care Standard (CCCS) and monitor colonoscopy performance against colonoscopy quality standards. |
|
5 |
Work with states and territories to pilot projects that reshape the PFUF role in line with innovative colonoscopy access models. |
|
6 |
Engage with Primary Health Networks (PHNs) and professional bodies (e.g., The Royal Australian College of General Practitioners and the Royal Australasian College of Physicians) to promote a comprehensive set of educational materials, which describe the NHMRC-approved clinical practice guidelines, the Program’s full alignment with biennial screening recommendations, and recent changes to the Medicare Benefits Schedule item codes for colonoscopy. |
|
7 |
Re-configure Program Delivery Advisory Group (PDAG) to include jurisdictional representatives that are able to provide operational advice on contextual issues related to colonoscopy access. |
|
8 |
Promote the Program’s research priorities to external researchers. |
|
9 |
Reset the working relationship with all stakeholders to ensure needs are being met in regard to the purpose of each group and expectations on information sharing. |
|
10 |
Reconvene a working group with the goal of prioritising initiatives to address data gaps and agree on any required changes to the endorsed set of KPIs. This group should be set-up over the medium to long term to manage the stakeholder engagement, effort and time required to implement and oversee initiatives to address data gaps. |
|
11 |
Improve visibility of the target population’s participation in other forms of bowel cancer screening, including via over-the-counter iFOBT kits or kits provided by clinicians. Identifying invitees in the target population deemed to be at higher risk for bowel cancer (who may be undergoing surveillance colonoscopies) would also allow a more accurate measure of the true Program participation rate. |
|
12 |
Implement sustained and coordinated media and communications campaigns. Campaigns should be national in nature (across jurisdictional and cancer charities, where possible) to promote a coordinated message that minimises fragmentation and duplication of effort. |
|
13 |
Use the primary care sector as a resource to promote participation through education and opportunistic provision of kits. GPs, practice nurses and pharmacists are well placed to promote and provide counselling regarding Program participation. |
|
14 |
Consider piloting sample drop-off points. Trials of this nature should initially be targeted at people in regional areas due to their unique challenges in complying with the strict return postage requirements. |
|
15 |
Scale up the Alternative Pathway pilot, as appropriate in other population groups. This includes other locations targeted at Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people, as well as exploration of how the pilot could be tailored to address access barriers faced by invitees from CALD backgrounds. |
|
16 |
Explore utilisation of the NCSR to improve participation. This could include electronic reminders, streamlined processes for completion of personal details, access to in-language communications, as well as personalised invitations based on Program screening history and/or demographic factors. However, given phone/email contact information is unavailable for first-time screeners, mechanisms to collect this information from other government databases, such as MyGov, may be required. |
|
17 |
Modify kit contents and accessories to mitigate common reasons for non-completion. This may include an action plan for completion contained in the kit instructions (to overcome the procrastination barrier), and/or provision of accessories such as an opaque bag for fridge storage (to overcome perceived hygiene concerns). |
|
Overview
The Australian Government’s National Bowel Cancer Screening Program invites eligible Australians aged between 50 to 74 years to screen every two years using a free and simple screening test. The Program aims to reduce deaths from bowel cancer by detecting early signs of the disease.
In 2020, the Department of Health commissioned Deloitte Access Economics to undertake an independent review of the National Bowel Cancer Screening Program. A Review Report has now been finalised and the Department is inviting your feedback on its findings. The Review Report can be found here: NBCSP Review Report.
The Review Report identifies opportunities in five key focus areas: appropriateness of the Program; appropriateness of colonoscopy; governance; data collection and participation.
The Department has prepared a short Consultation Paper which contains the findings from the Report and a series of discussion prompts to help gather targeted feedback. Responses are not limited to the discussion prompts and additional relevant information is welcome. Wherever possible, please provide facts and/or data to support your views.
Consultation Information
You are invited to provide a written submission (no more than 1500 words) via the Consultation Hub.
Consultation is now open and submissions close at 11:59 AEST, Friday 17 June 2022.
Note that all submissions will be made publicly available. If you do not wish your submission to be published, please indicate this in the submission.
If you have any questions about the consultation process, please contact NBCSPReview@health.gov.au.
Why your views matter
Your feedback is valued and will be important in informing any future direction of the Program.
What happens next
Your responses to the review findings will be considered by the Department of Health to inform any future direction of the Program. The outcome of the Review will be published through a written response to be published on the Department of Health’s consultation website.
Audiences
- Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander People
- Seniors
- Men
- Women
- Carers and guardians
- Families
- Academics
- Non-government organisations
- State government agencies
- Commonwealth agencies
- Local governments
- Health professionals
- Health workforce
- General public
- Community groups
Interests
- Policy Development
- Cancer
Share
Share on Twitter Share on Facebook