Your Details
Which of the following categories best describes you?
Please select one item
(Required)
Individual - consumer
Individual - community pharmacist (employee)
Ticked
Individual - community pharmacy owner
Individual - consultant pharmacist
Individual - pharmacy employee (non-pharmacist)
Individual - hospital pharmacist
Individual - other health professional
Individual - retired pharmacist
Organisation - Consumer
Organisation - Pharmacy Representative Body
Organisation - Commercial Pharmacy Group
Organisation - Pharmaceutical Wholesaler
Organisation - Medicines Industry
Organisation - Chemotherapy Compounder
Organisation - Other Commercial Entity
Organisation - Other Health Professional
Organisation - Hospital
Government Entity
Other
Chapter 4: Community Pharmacy Remuneration by Government
OPTION 4-1: ACCOUNTING INFORMATION
Please select one item
Agree
Ticked
Disagree
Make a comment
The present system supports a network of community pharmacies distributed across Australia. The cost of supply to government is one of the lowest in the developed world. The notion of basing the cost of supply upon the lowest common denominator destroys the tenant of universal access to the NHS.
OPTION 4-2: REMUNERATION TO BE BASED ON EFFICIENT COSTS OF DISPENSING
Please select one item
Agree
Ticked
Disagree
Make a comment
See comments for 4-1
What does this gobble-de-googch speak mean. The questions are circular in their intent.
The intent is to reduce the NHS to a the level of delivery without regard to patient outcomes and without regard quality use of medicines.
Just throw the medicine over the wall. Let the patient deal with the outcome of the use of the medicine.
The questions are framed in a biased manner. Indicating that the panel are seeking a preconceived outcome.
What does this gobble-de-googch speak mean. The questions are circular in their intent.
The intent is to reduce the NHS to a the level of delivery without regard to patient outcomes and without regard quality use of medicines.
Just throw the medicine over the wall. Let the patient deal with the outcome of the use of the medicine.
The questions are framed in a biased manner. Indicating that the panel are seeking a preconceived outcome.
OPTION 4-3: BENCHMARK FOR AN EFFICIENT DISPENSE
Please select one item
Agree
Ticked
Disagree
Make a comment
I would not have a business at your suggested fee.
Good luck with maintaining universal access to the NHS
The above will not generate a return on my investment , it will cover my costs only.
Good luck with maintaining universal access to the NHS
The above will not generate a return on my investment , it will cover my costs only.
OPTION 4-4: REMUNERATION FOR DISPENSING – FORMULA
Please select one item
Agree
Ticked
Disagree
Make a comment
That is just more economic ivory tower bull Redacted text. Try living in the real world
OPTION 4-5: REMUNERATION LIMITS
Please select one item
Agree
Ticked
Disagree
Make a comment
Just more of the same . If your suggestion above is correct , you intend replacing what you see as opaque with another government opaque system.
OPTION 4-6: REMUNERATION FOR OTHER SERVICES
Please select one item
Agree
Ticked
Disagree
Make a comment
How can I agree when I am not privy to the other behind the government wall deals.
How do you expect anyone to comment on this without having a vested interest
How do you expect anyone to comment on this without having a vested interest