Response 753075591

Back to Response listing

Before your start, please advise your consent to publish response

1. We would like your permission to publish your online survey responses to the discussion paper. Please indicate your publishing preference:

Please select one item
(Required)
Publish response (include both my name and organisation's name)
Publish response, but keep my name private (include my organisation's name)
Ticked Publish response anonymously (remove both my name and organisation's name)
Do not publish response

Before you start, please tell us about yourself

5. What stakeholder category do you most identify with?

Please select all that apply
(Required)
Consumer
Carer or other consumer representative
Consumer advocacy organisation
Consumer peak body
Carer peak body
Ticked Approved provider of residential aged care
Approved provider of flexible aged care
Approved provider of home care
Aged care provider peak body
Provider of private aged care or seniors accommodation
Aged Care Assessment Team/Service
Aged care worker
Health professional
Workforce association or union
Primary Health Network
State and territory government
Local council
Commonwealth agency
Lender or investor/financier
Other
Please select one item
Ticked not-for-profit
for-profit
government
Please select one item
Ticked operating a single aged care home only
operating 2 to 6 aged care homes
operating 7 to 19 aged care homes
operating 20 or more aged care homes
Please select one item
Ticked mostly offering single rooms with ensuites
mostly offering single rooms with shared bathrooms
mostly offering shared rooms with an ensuite
mostly offering shared rooms with common bathroom
mostly offering ‘other’ room type

6. Where does your organisation operate (if applicable)? Otherwise, where do you live?

Please select all that apply
(Required)
New South Wales
Australian Capital Territory
Victoria
Queensland
South Australia
Western Australia
Northern Territory
Ticked Tasmania
All states and territories in Australia
Please select all that apply
(Required)
In a remote area
Ticked In a rural area
Ticked In a regional area
In a metropolitan area or major city

Current arrangements

7. What works well under the current residential aged care allocation and places management model for consumers and/or providers?

Strengths of current arrangements for consumers
Places generally available in locations they need them.
Strengths of current arrangements for providers
Known number of licences. Ability to apply for more if expansion required.

8. Are there other issue/s with the current model for the allocation and management of places for residential aged care that have not been covered in this paper?

Other issues with current arrangements for consumers
No
Other issues with current arrangements for providers
No

Design principles for alternative allocation models

9. Are the proposed design principles appropriate?

Please select one item
Yes
Ticked No
Please elaborate on your response
They do not provide suficient flexibility and certainty for providers.

10. Are there any other principles that you consider should be included?

Please select one item
Yes
Ticked No

Model 1: Improve the ACAR and places management - Overall model

11. What are your views on the suggested improvements proposed under this model?

Views on model 1
Good idea to try to reduce the excessive numbers of non-operational places.
Does not apear to be significantly different to the existing arrangements.

Model 1: Improve the ACAR and places management - Key design considerations

12. How can this model ensure/encourage adequate supply of and equitable access to residential aged care and residential respite care (aside from increasing funding or revising the funding model), including:

in rural, regional and remote areas and other thin markets?
Continue to allocate places based on need/demand.
Introduce incentives for additional places where demand exists.
for consumers from vulnerable cohorts (such as Special Needs Groups, consumers with dementia)?
As above.

14. What other key changes could be made to the existing ACAR and/or places management arrangements to encourage a more consumer driven and competitive residential aged care sector?

Other key changes to ACAR
More felxibility in terms of where the demand actually is rather than a forulaic model.

Model 2: Assign residential aged care places to consumers - Exploring the potential impacts

35. What would be the overall potential impact of this model (consider benefits, costs, and risks) on you or the organisation or stakeholder group you represent?

Model 2 potential impact
Introduce too much uncertainty. Would make the provision of places virtually untenable.
No incentive to incerease the number of places if there is no certainty that they will be filled.
May end up with heavy focus on highly populated metropolitan areas to the detriment of regional and rural areas.

36. What do you think might be the impact on the residential aged care sector overall?

Model 2 overall sector impact
Negative and additional uncertainty and risk.

40. How might the allocation, eligibility criteria and/or administrative provisions (e.g. terms of repayment) for capital grants allocated through the ACAR need to change to best support the needs and objectives of a more market based model?

Model 2 capital grants
Hard to see how the grant could be linked to provision of services if the services themselves are outside the control of the provider i.e. in the hands of the consumer.

General views

42. Aside from the two proposed models, how else could we encourage greater consumer choice and a more consumer driven market in residential aged care?

Other models to consider
Given the relatively high occupancy levels nationally and much higher in some locations there is not much scope for choice - consumers have to go where there are available places.

43. Do you have any other overall comments you wish to provide?

General comments
Number of non-operational places is way too high. this needs to be brought under better control immediately. Much tighter control needs to be implemented on places between allocation and making operational.